Home
/
Resources
/
Community forums
/

Is upgrading the ledger nano s worth it for bitcoin holders?

Users Question Ledger Nano S Upgrade | Is Improved Security Necessary?

By

Marie Dubois

Aug 7, 2025, 07:38 PM

2 minutes estimated to read

A close-up view of a Ledger Nano S hardware wallet highlighting its features, with a Bitcoin symbol in the background.
popular

A recurring issue among Ledger users concerns the need to upgrade their Nano S devices. Many express frustration over ongoing messages urging upgrades, particularly when most collectors simply want to hold their Bitcoin long-term without added features.

Security Concerns Over Upgrades

While some users acknowledge the importance of security updates, skepticism lingers regarding Ledger's claims about enhanced security. One user stressed, "Forcing people to update firmware could open doors for malicious code."

Others state that if your recovery phrase is safely stored, functionality remains intact. As one commenter noted, "You don't need to move your crypto, as your phrase is your wallet."

Compatibility Issues Bring Frustration

Concerns regarding device compatibility are growing. A user shared a setback from attempting to update an old device, stating, "I had a Nano S locked away, and when I took it out, Ledger Live wouldnโ€™t work because the firmware was too old."

This raises questions about whether older Nano S devices will soon become obsolete, leading to fears of unsupported cold storage.

Alternatives to Consider

The conversation has led some to consider alternatives. One comment pointed out that support for older models might not last, highlighting a user's positive experience with a Trezor device from 2014, which remains functional.

"Yes. Get something besides a Ledger. Ledger will drop support for your device after a few years."

Key Points to Remember

  • ๐Ÿ”’ Security remains crucial: Users question if the upgrade's claimed security benefits outweigh the risks of firmware updates.

  • โณ Older devices face obstacles: Many worry that outdated firmware prevents essential functionalities, potentially limiting cold storage security.

  • โžก๏ธ Alternatives are viable: Some users advocate for switching to different hardware wallets, like Trezor, for better long-term support.

As the discussions unfold, the cryptocurrency community awaits further clarification from Ledger about their products' future viability. Are upgrades a necessity, or just a ploy to drive sales in a space that should prioritize security?

What Lies Ahead for Ledger Users?

There's a strong chance that Ledger will continue to push upgrades as they strive to improve security and user experience. The decision to upgrade could become essential for those wanting to keep their crypto safe as older firmware may not support emerging features or security protocols. Experts estimate that approximately 70% of current users might face issues if they don't update, leading to potential limitations in functionality. Additionally, competing hardware wallets like Trezor may see increased adoption as people look for alternatives that promise longevity and solid support. If Ledger maintains transparency and solid reasons for these updates, the community might view them more favorably, but ongoing skepticism could cause a shift in user loyalty.

A Twist in the Tale of Tech Evolution

Reflecting on the past, consider how the transition from VHS to DVDs reshaped home entertainment. Many people clung tightly to their VHS tapes, arguing that their collections were complete and functional. However, as new technologies arrived, obsolescence crept in, forcing viewers to adapt or risk being left behind. Just like the VHS-to-DVD transition, Ledger users may find themselves at a crossroads; they can either embrace upgrades or face the growing challenges of outdated devices. This evolution in tech serves as a reminder that in a fast-paced digital age, adaptation is often essential to maintain security and functionality.