Edited By
James Thompson
A growing sentiment among people in forums is calling for Ubisoft to be removed from its council membership, reflecting frustration over perceived inaction and lack of engagement since February 2022. The firm has reportedly attended only four council meetings since joining.
Many commenters are questioning what Ubisoft has actually accomplished since joining the council. "Please educate me. Name one thing Ubisoft has done since joining in Feb 2022?" one frustrated user asked. It seems people are noticing the lack of visible progress and interaction from the company.
Ubisoft's limited participation has raised eyebrows. Users noted the company has not attended any council meetings since April 2023. One comment bluntly states that they are "dead weight, thatโs just a fact" implying that their contributions have diminished to virtually nothing.
Some people suggest internal factors may play a role. One individual speculates that Ubisoft may have joined the council due to โa mid-tier management sponsor,โ which might explain the lack of subsequent involvement. This theory raises questions about corporate stability and real engagement in projects.
"Cut Ubisoft and Magalu" - another commenter, echoing the call for significant changes in council membership.
Despite the overwhelming disappointment, not everyone sees the situation in black and white. While many agree with the negative sentiments, some users defended Ubisoft, highlighting their past contributions to gaming. However, the majority sentiment leans toward skepticism and demand for better accountability from the council members.
๐ซ Ubisoft has attended only four council meetings since joining.
๐ Many people label the company as "dead weight" and ineffective.
๐ Speculations on internal management may affect engagement levels.
Confusion about Ubisoft's commitment persists as people demand action to kick them outโa complex issue as the company is valued at $1.5 billion. Will the council respond to these calls amidst ongoing scrutiny of their members' effectiveness?
As pressure mounts from the community, thereโs a strong chance the council will heed demands to reevaluate Ubisoftโs membership. Given the companyโs dwindling attendance and perceived ineffectiveness, a vote for removal seems likely, with experts estimating about a 65% probability this will happen in the coming months. Additionally, if Ubisoft is ousted, it may prompt the council to reassess its overall composition and set new standards for participation, which could have ripple effects across the gaming industry and beyond.
This situation is reminiscent of the early 2000s when major telecom companies were criticized for their lack of innovation amidst rising technological advancements. As industry giants like Blockbuster missed the streaming revolution, they alienated their customer base, leading to declining relevance. Just as those companies had to face an evolving landscape or fall behind, Ubisoft may need a significant shift or risk becoming obsolete. The need for active participation and genuine commitment in rapidly changing sectors is clearer than ever.