Home
/
Regulatory news
/
Government policies
/

Cyber attack on bank sepah raises concerns over self custody

Cyber Attack on Bank Sepah | Eroding Trust in Iranโ€™s Financial System

By

Marie Dubois

Jun 20, 2025, 03:31 AM

Edited By

Michael Zhang

Updated

Jun 20, 2025, 08:36 AM

2 minutes estimated to read

A visual representation of a cyber attack on Bank Sepah, showing a digital lock and crashing data icons, symbolizing the loss of customer information.
popular

A damaging cyberattack has hit Iranโ€™s Bank Sepah, disrupting operations and erasing crucial database information. The hacking group Gonjeshke Darande, tied to Israel, claims the bank funds Iranโ€™s military. This incident raises significant concerns over cybersecurity at a time of heightened geopolitical tensions.

Attack Details

The cyber assault recently rendered ATMs useless, blocking customers from accessing their accounts. Fears are intensifying regarding the reliability of Iranian banks during the ongoing conflict with Israel.

Key Impacts of the Attack

  • Data Loss and Transaction Failures: Users are currently unable to access their funds.

  • Allegations of Military Support: The hacker groupโ€™s claim casts new light on the bankโ€™s role in Iranโ€™s military funding.

  • Increased Self-Custody Interest: As one community member noted, "You canโ€™t rely on governments; custody is a necessity nowadays."

Community Reactions

Threads on forums reflect a mix of outrage and disbelief:

"Are you suggesting that instead of banks, we should go back to keeping cash under the mattress and providing our own home security?"

Another user pointed out the flaws in current bank security management:

"The people running exchanges donโ€™t care about your security. To them, itโ€™s just another grift."

Interestingly, some comments highlighted the perceived immunity of decentralized blockchains against such data loss, emphasizing how cryptocurrency can be managed without needing an ATM.

Demand for Change

Citizens' trust in traditional banking is eroding. Many are now seeking alternatives, driven by a sense of vulnerability and the urgent need for personal asset control.

Key Insights

  • ๐Ÿ”’ Citizens increasingly doubt traditional banking security.

  • โš ๏ธ The Iran-Israel conflict raises financial institutions' vulnerability.

  • ๐Ÿ’ก Calls for improved cybersecurity measures grow stronger, emphasizing recovery and prevention strategies.

  • ๐Ÿ’ฐ Users are considering self-custody options, as some echo, "Bitcoin doesnโ€™t have FDIC insurance."

As trust in centralized banking diminishes, the demand for decentralized solutions is likely to surge. Experts forecast a potential 40% increase in self-custody adoption over the next two years, driven by fears and the desire for autonomy.

Looking Ahead

Expect more cyber threats targeting financial institutions amid rising geopolitical crises. This incident underscores the fragile nature of trust in financial systems and highlights the pressing need for innovation in cybersecurity protocols.

Citizens might revert to cash or alternative digital currencies, mirroring past responses to financial distressโ€”a behavior that signals the immediate need for robust safeguards in banking.