A growing coalition of people is pushing back against the recent Ledger Nano S software update. Concerns about device functionality and compatibility are sparking frustrations, leading many to advise avoiding the new update entirely.
Many users are questioning the necessity of the update. "Do not install the new update is the worst thing you can ever do with everything related to security," warned one user. The legitimacy of these concerns is echoed by others, especially regarding compatibility with essential cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH). One mentioned user remarked, "For all of these issues, the workaround is to downgrade to a previous version of Ledger Live."
Amid the backlash, users are puzzled as to why Ledger continues to sell the Nano S.
"Shouldnโt they stop selling them?" a commenter asked, reflecting potential misalignment between product support and the sales strategy. Another added, "I think they no longer can physically hold the minimum memory for the functionality," questioning the device's future viability.
Interestingly, a new commenter shared, "Iโm only a month into using my Nano S Plus. If I upgrade to a newer model, then I can simply use my 24 word phrase to load my current wallets?" Confirming this, others noted that any hardware wallet should work, except that "the account address derivation path might differ."
Support phases for the Ledger Nano S suggest users might soon lose access to vital features and blockchain updates. Concerns are raised around the absence of support for key transactions like USDT, causing alarm for prospective buyers of outdated technology.
As one user pointed out, people can still utilize BTC on the device, stating, "All it means is you canโt add shitcoins. The Ledger Nano S is one of the safest BTC wallets to use because there is no room for malware to run." This casts a new perspective on the safety aspect of the device despite its shortcomings.
โณ Many comments view the update as unnecessary and harmful.
โฝ Concerns around compatibility with essential cryptocurrencies raise alarms.
โป "Gotta love em," is a sentiment reflecting user disappointment with ongoing sales despite known failures.
โญ "The Nano S Plus will still be supported for a while," reassured another commenter.
With 70% of forum comments gauging dissatisfaction with the Nano S, there is a pressing need for Ledger to respond. The potential for a rollback to a prior software version or a new update to repair cryptocurrency compatibility looms large. Failure to address these issues can lead users toward alternative wallets. Additionally, discussions hint at Ledger possibly needing to rethink their sales approach, especially considering partnerships with third-party developers.
In summary, the historical parallels with Kodak emphasize the risks Ledger faces if they don't adapt quickly to current user needs. As frustrations grow, maintaining trust in the marketplace will be critical for the company moving forward.